Today's Content Brought to You By:

Click pic to enlarge.

Nut-Punch of the Week, Feb 1st-5th, '10

As we've discussed previously, the Nut-Punch is a figurative injury. A symbolic assault. And, being as it's about the furthest thing from an actual injury to the gonads imaginable, it's also incidental whether the target in question even has literal testes to begin with. Which becomes important to remember, especially in light of certain current events.

And it is in that spirit of equality for all (even when it comes to doling out nugget-knocks) that this week's nut-punch goes to none other than that Yukon Yokel herself. The Quitter-in-Chief. Herr'oner the Harlot.

Sarah Palin.

I'd ask her to step up to the lectern to accept, but I don't have time to give her a road map, and turn-by-turn directions.

Look, there's no longer any doubt that she's stupid. The debate over her glaringly-obvious lack of anything resembling a functional intellectual capacity was put to rest a long time ago. Whether citing the facts about her that were made apparent during the '08 presidential campaign (She doesn't read newspapers, is unclear on the role of the Vice President, and cites policies of governmental agencies that don't exist), or the stuff that's come out since the McCain/Palin ticket's defeat (she can't name her favorite founding father, quits her single term as governor 18 months shy, and doesn't know that Africa is a continent), any questions about her wattage have been answered dozens of times over. She's so fucking dim, she makes Dan Quayle look like a card-carrying Mensan. Yessiree, if there's any one thing Sarah Palin is good at, it's being a laughingstock dumbass.

At least, I thought she was good at it.

Nope. Not even THAT much.

Recently, Palin was invited to address a Teabagger's convention in order to speak to the morons who blame the current economic crisis on the guy who got it dumped on him. While there, she agreed to participate in a short Q&A with the audience. And, because she is a fucking flaming nitwit, she insisted that the questions be submitted in advance. Understandable, I suppose. Like most, I saw the V.P. debate, and the Couric interviews during the campaign. And when Sarah doesn't get the test questions in advance, she tends to choke harder than she would if there were actual testicles in her mouth.

So far, whatever. Garden-variety ass-covering bullshit from a proven imbecile. Nothing we didn't expect. But it's what happened during the actual Q&A that really launches her to new depths of "duuuuh." Because even lunk-headed dipshits who need crib notes to pass a test know not to keep them where anyone will see them, and to not make it obvious that you're cheating when you look at 'em. But no...not Sarah Palin.

Watch:



Wow. Just...Wow. It's one thing to be an abject, irredeemable bonehead. It's entirely another to be so motherfucking OBVIOUS about it. She's not even good at being stupid!

As if her hit-you-over-the-head obvious super-sneaky palm-peek wasn't enough, it seems she forgot her notes were in there while she was giving a speech at a different time. Several times, she gestured to the audience with her palms out, revealing her cheat sheet!

Whoopsie. Shouldn't have done that, huh?

And what makes this even funnier is the fact that during the speech in question, she actually criticized President Obama's use of a teleprompter! You could cut the irony with a rusty spoon. At least he (like most presidents before him since the invention of the bloody thing) uses the 'prompter to give speeches of consequence and detail. For the love of Christ, you had to write party tentpoles like "Energy," "taxes" and "lift America's spirits" on your hand to remember to mention them?!? That'd be like if Obama had to scribble crap like "health care," "job creation" and "D.A.D.T. go bye-bye" on the underside of his tie before the State of the Union Address!

Y'know, it's sad...Palin recently announced that she "isn't ruling out" a bid for the presidency come 2012. But given the fact that she's so goddamned stupid that she even sucks at BEING stupid, I simply cannot imagine how she thinks she has even the faintest glimmer of being taken seriously as a candidate.

That said, as a humorist...I hope she runs. We could use the material.

A Thanksgiving Gift from the Blog Gods

Here lies Satire, R.I.P.

500 BCE - 2008 AD

It was a good run:

From FOXNews.com -

Alaska governor officially pardons a turkey for Thanksgiving, then conducts TV interview at farm while another is seen being butchered in the background

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin officially pardoned a turkey for Thanksgiving at a farm in Wasilla, Alaska on Thursday, then conducted a television interview as another bird was clearly seen being slaughtered in the background.

As the former Republican vice presidential nominee spoke with a KTUU-TV reporter about returning to work in Alaska, just a few feet behind her a Triple D Farms worker is seen feeding a turkey into a grinder, periodically turning around to watch the on-going interview.

Palin, who called the pardoning experience "neat" was reportedly told by the station videographer what was going on behind her, but allowed the interview to continue.

Let the Avalanche Begin!

LOOK OUT! Here comes the cataclysmic post-election Sarah Palin snowslide of stupidity wherein we learn little Trig isn't the only special needs member of the Palin Clan.

Amy Poehler…

…I would like to have your next baby. Think about it. Email diaryoffools@hotmail.com when you're ready.

Eskimos how you feelin'?

Ice cold!

If you laugh at this, you're going to hell.

But, at least I'll see you there.

Champion of Society

Naming Your Kids Dumb Shit

There is an infinite list of crap that you can do to screw up your kid’s life, most of which you have no control over. However, naming your kid is something you do have control over. So before naming your kid you should consider all the possibilities and then consider the name contenders default nickname’s a.k.a shit your kid could be tormented with.



I never really got why people would name their kid Richard, it’s too easy. As soon as kids are old enough to realize what dick means, you know they’ll be using it against the poor schmuck named Richard. Kids will use anything they can think of against a name, literally. Take the name Mary, it’s a very common name, no one could be made fun of for that. Wrong. As each generation gets older, let’s just say they “mature” a lot faster than you would think. Thought nothing was wrong with Mary, well here’s a little ditty I once heard “Mary, Mary, quite contrary, well the hell is your p*ssy so goddamn hairy?” It is that simple people.


So think long and hard people before you go naming your kid because not only will they have to suffer with it until they can legally change it, but they will resent you even more than they already probably will. Take this dude for example, Mark Ciptak of Tennessee and his wife had already chosen on a nice name for their baby girl, Ava Grace. Apparently that didn’t suit Mr. Ciptak, because after their little bundle of joy was born he decided to name his daughter Sarah McCain Palin.


Mr. Ciptak is quoted as saying “I took one for the cause . . . I can’t give a lot of financial support for the campaign. I do have a sign up in my yard, but I can do very little.” In addition to naming his kid after douche number 1 and douche number 2, it seems as if he never even discussed this with his wife because she still doesn’t believe him. If Mr. Ciptak wanted to name his kid after a terrible political leader, he should have named it Richard Nixon; two birds, one stone, if only it was a boy.

http://www.tricities.com/tri/news/local/article/elizabethton_baby_named_sarah_mccain_palin/14996/

I Salute you Philly

Vice-presidential candidate and self-proclaimed hockey mom Sarah Palin spent this past Saturday at a Philadelphia Flyers’ game to drop the ceremonial first puck. Philly fans are known to be the most brutal in the nation and they basically tore Palin a new one. To be fair, as the video goes on the initial onslaught of the very audible boos just sort of turns into a mash up of random noise. My favorite are the people giving the thumbs down sign in the background.

I must say that I am happy that Philly fans are obnoxious a-holes. Not only do I enjoy a good boo-ing and other generally obnoxious sports fan behavior, but most other places would have given her the obligatory golf clap and moved on. So, I salute you Philadelphia for always letting your true feelings be known, and for doing so in a rude manner.

Your Headlines for October 9, 2008

From DoF Newswire

Fascination with Sarah Palin Enters "3rd Hour at Strip Club" Phase

Media onslaught desensitizing most Americans

Rolling Stones Outlive Last Original Concert-Goer

Obama Receives Wacky Tie from Children, Shamed into Wearing it During Debate

Plays "Heart and Soul", starts blinking in middle of health plan explanation

DoF Exclusive! The Joe Sixpack Interview with Blaine Fridley

Gov. Sarah Palin has been in the spotlight on the stage of American politics since her coming-out party at the 2008 Republican National Convention. Supporters hail her as reformer. A young, photogenic woman whose MILFy attractiveness belies her reported reputation as a feisty pit bull willing to take on the "mainstream Washington insiders" and fight for the average American. A maverick, if you will. Her detractors, on the other hand, do not like her because she is in fact, none of these things. That, and she's grossly under-qualified. Details, details, details.

Over the course of several highly scrutinized interviews and one recent debate, voters have been learning more and more about just where, exactly, Palin stands on the issues and who she wants to represent by sifting through her sludge of mixed tenses, muddled run-on sentences and cumbersome, over-done colloquialisms for nuggets of vagaries. 

From this, the Alaskan governor has made it very clear that nobody is expected to benefit more from a McCain/Palin victory (Tina Fey not included) than Joe Sixpack. 

So just who, exactly, is Joe Sixpack? The DoF traveled to his southern New Jersey split-level to find out.

DoF: Let me first apologize for scheduling this interview during the Eagles game.

Joe Sixpack: Oh, that'sJEEEEZUS MCNABB! THROWITAWAY!THROWITAWAY! Sorry, about that. You wanna beer or a deviled egg or something?

DoF: No thanks. So tell me, how did it feel when you heard Palin specifically making your well-being a priority of the McCain/Palin campaign?

JS: FUCKMEUPTHEASS!HE'S OPEN!HE'S OPEN! FOR THE LOVE OF RON JAWORSKI'S LEFT TESTICLE WOULD YOU FUCKS PLEASE PULL YOUR HEAD OUT OF YOUR ASS! I'm sorry, I'm sorry…what were you saying? 

DoF: How do you feel about Palin making you a priori--

JS: --Palin? Well, yeah, I'd bang her I guess.

DoF: Bang her?

JS: Yeah, bang her. You know bend her over that moose carcass and really go to town, you know? There's something about a woman in Mossy Oak® Camo that gives me a wicked stiffy...am I wrong?

DoF: Well-

JS: -well what? You queer or something? Nah, I'm just messing with youOHFUCKMEUPTHEASSWITHRANDALLCUNNINGHAM'SBIGBLACKCOCK! CATCH THE FUCKING BALL, JACKSON YOU ASSHOLE! I can tell you who SHOULDN'T be vice president, Andy Fucking Reid, that's who. That asshole couldn't coach a team out of a broom closet.

DoF: The question was actually how do you feel about Palin taking up your cause, and will that sway your vote come November?

JS: Vote? I haven't voted since the late '80s.

DoF: Bush or Dukakis?

JS: Bush or Dookiewhonow? What the hell are you talking about? No, I voted Bud Dry for MVP of Bud Bowl III. You remember that kick return he had to win the game? That. was. awwwwesome! I actually taped it if you wanna watch it-

DoF: -oh, no, that's OK

JS: Fucking great, here it is:

DoF: Umm...yeah, that's great.

JS: I also have some pretty great titty flix, if you're into that.

DoF: No, I think I'll-

JS: -you'll think nothing, because I don't watch pornos with other dudes. So forget about it, queer.

DoF: Look, don't you think you owe it to yourself to vote for a ticket that is claiming to have your best interests in mind?

JS: Actually, I owe it to myself NOT to vote for McCain/Palin.

DoF: Really?

JS: Yeah, it's like Howard Stern said: "If the gods had intended for people to vote, they would have given us candidates." 

DoF: I think that was Howard Zinn who said that.

JS: Howard Zinn? Who the hell is that? Either way, I'd still bang that Palin broad.

Election 2008: The VP Debate

by Blaine Fridley

So far I've sat through one RNC speech, two hilariously painful interviews that she had weeks to prepare for and now a debate, or rather make that a "debate". And from those wonderful opportunities to define herself to the American public, this is what I know about Sarah Palin:

1. Like McCain, she's a maverick.

2. Her lack of syntax, folksy "ya betchas" and "ya darn rights" mixed with an ability to meld unrelated talking points into meandering, convoluted, mega run-on sentences all team up to make my head hurt very badly.

3. Did I mention the McCain/Palin ticket is a team of mavericks? Well, if I didn't, just ask Sarah Palin a question, ANY question, and she'll be sure to bring it up 3-7 times within her answer:

So, Gov. Palin, what Top Gun character would you say you would model your vice presidency after?

"Maverick."

And your favorite NBA franchise?

"Mavericks."

Mel Gibson movie?

"Mad Max. HA! You thought I was going to say Maverick didn't you? Well, I didn't…because I'm a maverick!"

Are you aware that you're a vapid wasteland of nonsensical ramblings?

"I'm gonna have to look up the definition of vapid and get back to YA."

I loathe you.

"Maverick."

We all know there's only ONE Maverick. And he looks amazing playing topless beach volleyball in skin-tight jeans. 

Last night, in the first and only scheduled VP debate, fans of schadenfreude and train wrecks everywhere tuned in to see what we thought was going to be the inevitable Palin breakdown. 

Ultimately though, we were let down. The catastrophic embarrassment many of us were hoping for did not happen. Instead, we had to settle for just regular ol' embarrassment. Nothing really worth bumping The Office for, anyway.

It's that subterranean bar that has led people to speak of Palin's Thursday night performance as competent. I can think of one "c-word" to describe Palin, and it sure as hell isn't competent.

From Ezra Klein on Prospect.org: 

"Palin turned in a genuinely competent performance, and Biden turned in a superlative one."

Marc Ambiner on Atlantic.com:

"Averaging expectations, style and points, it was a wash. Partisans have reason to be satisfied; I honestly have no idea how undecided voters will react…"

Adding: "…she did nothing negatively indelibly memorable, and, at times, was positively impressive."

Washington Post:

"Palin, who struggled with questions in televised interviews, came to Thursday's debate well briefed. She did not stumble over names of foreign leaders. . She had quick comebacks when Biden challenged her or went after McCain."

The Guardian:

"Palin defies critics and delivers punchy performance in debate against Biden."

The New York Times:

"By surviving her encounter with Senator Joseph R. Biden Jr. and quelling some of the talk about her basic qualifications for high office, she may even have done Senator John McCain a bit of good, freeing him to focus on the other troubles shadowing his campaign."

Were we watching the same debate?

Just because Palin didn't shit her pants and then, terror-stricken, stare into the camera until her head blew up like that scene in Scanners, doesn't mean her performance was competent:

In fact, it was FAR from it. Here's a typical response from last night's debate:

Now doggone it? 

What are you, an 1840s prospector?

"Our schools have really got to be ramped up in terms of funding…"

…and you plan on doing that by NOT raising taxes while simultaneously

hemorrhaging billions of dollars in Iraq?

"I come from a house full of school teachers…"

Really? Are they the ones who taught you about sentence structure and verbal punctuation? 

Limited talking points and broad ideas with not even an attempt at further clarification. This is all we got last night. If this were a high school debate class, she would've received a D+…maybe.

Who would make you feel more comfortable as Vice President of the United States?

Haven't we seen this "the more ignorant I am about an issue (in Palin's case RE: EVERYTHING) the more brazenly resolute I'll be about it" bit somewhere before?

Fucking A. Mr. Fareed Zakaria, please, break it down:

Palin Is Ready? Please.
McCain says that he always puts country first. In this important case, that is simply not true.

Fareed Zakaria
NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated Oct 6, 2008

Will someone please put Sarah Palin out of her agony? Is it too much to ask that she come to realize that she wants, in that wonderful phrase in American politics, "to spend more time with her family"? Having stayed in purdah for weeks, she finally agreed to a third interview. CBS's Katie Couric questioned her in her trademark sympathetic style. It didn't help. When asked how living in the state closest to Russia gave her foreign-policy experience, Palin responded thus:

"It's very important when you consider even national-security issues with Russia as Putin rears his head and comes into the airspace of the United States of America. Where—where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there. They are right next to—to our state."

There is, of course, the sheer absurdity of the premise. Two weeks ago I flew to Tokyo, crossing over the North Pole. Does that make me an expert on Santa Claus? (Thanks, Jon Stewart.) But even beyond that, read the rest of her response. "It is from Alaska that we send out those …" What does this mean? This is not an isolated example. Palin has been given a set of talking points by campaign advisers, simple ideological mantras that she repeats and repeats as long as she can. ("We mustn't blink.") But if forced off those rehearsed lines, what she has to say is often, quite frankly, gibberish.

Couric asked her a smart question about the proposed $700 billion bailout of the American financial sector. It was designed to see if Palin understood that the problem in this crisis is that credit and liquidity in the financial system has dried up, and that that's why, in the estimation of Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke, the government needs to step in to buy up Wall Street's most toxic liabilities. Here's the entire exchange:

COURIC: Why isn't it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?

PALIN: That's why I say I, like every American I'm speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it's got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we've got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we've got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.

This is nonsense—a vapid emptying out of every catchphrase about economics that came into her head. Some commentators, like CNN's Campbell Brown, have argued that it's sexist to keep Sarah Palin under wraps, as if she were a delicate flower who might wilt under the bright lights of the modern media. But the more Palin talks, the more we see that it may not be sexism but common sense that's causing the McCain campaign to treat her like a time bomb.

Can we now admit the obvious? Sarah Palin is utterly unqualified to be vice president. She is a feisty, charismatic politician who has done some good things in Alaska. But she has never spent a day thinking about any important national or international issue, and this is a hell of a time to start. The next administration is going to face a set of challenges unlike any in recent memory. There is an ongoing military operation in Iraq that still costs $10 billion a month, a war against the Taliban in Afghanistan and Pakistan that is not going well and is not easily fixed. Iran, Russia and Venezuela present tough strategic challenges.

Domestically, the bailout and reform of the financial industry will take years and hundreds of billions of dollars. Health-care costs, unless curtailed, will bankrupt the federal government. Social Security, immigration, collapsing infrastructure and education are all going to get much worse if they are not handled soon.

And the American government is stretched to the limit. Between the Bush tax cuts, homeland-security needs, Iraq, Afghanistan and the bailout, the budget is looking bleak. Plus, within a few years, the retirement of the baby boomers begins with its massive and rising costs (in the trillions).

Obviously these are very serious challenges and constraints. In these times, for John McCain to have chosen this person to be his running mate is fundamentally irresponsible. McCain says that he always puts country first. In this important case, it is simply not true.

URL: http://www.newsweek.com/id/161204© 2008

Thank you, Fareed.

Political Gimmicks

By Lucy Parker

I follow politics pretty closely, here in America and abroad as well. I find the whole American election process to be interesting; from the actual candidate to the political strategists and the all too typical itineraries politicians seem to be on since birth. One thing always seemed apparent to me, whether Republican or Democrat, all politicians are pretty much the same, just different labels.

However, in 2004 at the Democratic national convention my interest was peaked by a young Illinois state senator. Ever since his key note speech, I have followed Senator Barack Obama; a former community organizer to United States senator, and now the Democratic nominee for president of the United States. Needless to say, it was apparent that this election would be like no other election this country has seen. I saw it as an indication of this county’s progress, an indication of what this country might yet one day be. In early 2007, when Senator Obama announced his candidacy for president of the United States it was an understatement to say he gave me hope, he gave me faith.

The Democratic primaries would be a historic race, and Hilary Clinton proved to be a formidable opponent. While I was not a supporter of Senator Clinton, she has a proven political record and is capable of running this country, something I could respect. I was proud, not only as a Hispanic woman, but as an American; that in only a few short decades since the Civil Rights Movement and in under a century since women fought and earned the right to vote, we were in the midst of a presidential election where two of the top candidates were an African-American and a female.

With a majority of the country’s political attention span staying focused on what was happening with the Democratic primaries, it became clear after a tight race that Senator Obama would win the nomination. And even when it was clear that Senator Obama would win the nomination, the momentum stayed with the Democrats. A desperate move would be needed, a move that would either sink or swim the Republican chance at presidency. The Republicans never being one to be short on political strategy, came up with the biggest political gimmick of them all by naming Alaskan Governor Sarah Palin as their Vice Presidential nominee.

Sarah who? I had only heard of Governor Palin once before, when it was announced that she was 7 months pregnant while in office. An apparent news worthy event. A self-styled “maverick”, Senator John McCain and his campaign made repeated references to how Governor Palin has taken on the good ol’ boys club, while offering little to back it up. A simple Google search would yield the necessary information needed about Governor Palin.

This self-described “hockey mom” who likes to hunt and the great outdoors is also a life-long member of the NRA and supports drilling in Alaska, including the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR); has stated as recently as a month ago, then taken back, that she thinks global warming is not caused by man, and has gone up against the government to remove polar bears and beluga whales from the endangered species list. I guess that is what they are referring to when they say Governor Palin has gone against the good ol’ boys club, because a further look into her policies shows otherwise. Governor Palin is against a women’s right to choose, even in cases of rape and incest; she is against same sex marriages and in the past has supported referendums denying same sex couples state health benefits. Governor Palin also supports the death penalty and abstinence only sex education programs, and her foreign policy literally scares me.

These are not new policies; Governor Palin does not represent the reform this country needs, just like Senator McCain doesn’t. So, why did Senator McCain chose her as his running mate? Because she is a female, and because after the last 8 years of the Bush administration, they needed to present some form of opportunity of change. For Governor Palin, being female is the only difference.

It is true, the woman vote is powerful. But, to expect us to vote for someone, to expect anyone, to vote for someone because of their gender, is insulting. I have never once doubted that in my life time I would see a female president, or a could-be female president. However, I, like so many other Americans, imagined that the female candidate would be someone worthy and capable of the position, not someone who was chosen as a political gimmick. Personally, I cast my vote based upon the candidate who has the most similar political policies as I do.

While I do not agree with Governor Palin’s political policies, it is not the reason I do not find her capable of the office of vice president. Governor Palin put it best as to why she isn’t ready to be vice president: "As for that VP talk all the time, I'll tell you, I still can't answer that question until somebody answers for me what is it exactly that the VP does every day?" (CNBC's "Kudlow & Co", July 2008)

New 9/11 Memorial Opens, CNN Poops on it

by Gloucester de la Vegas, Gifted/Talented Child, Arts/Culture Correspondent

We here at "Diary of Fools" like making fun of other people. Why wouldn't we? Sure, I eat paste and believe in the Tooth Fairy, but I still know they deserve it. Welcome to life, old people. It's half about sorrow and half about how dumb you are. I mean, not YOU, but those other people.

But if CNN is going to put up an article concerning a new memorial to those who died on September 11, 2001, in terrorist attacks...why would they make the headline "Pentagon 9/11 memorial honors victims in symbols, concrete"? And the lack of capitalization is theirs, not mine. And that's just the start of it. If you read this "article", you will learn exactly how NOT to write about sculpture, and how to make every possible mistake.

Here's just one key quote: "the wall is designed to remind visitors of the youngest and oldest victims, wrapping the memorial in symbolic imagery." Well, put simply, and I guess that's how you like it, CNN.com, -- an artistic memorial to a tragedy can't be, so to speak "wrapped in [its own] symbolic imagery". No artwork can, that doesn't make sense.

In about 13 years I hope I can get an internship at CNN.com so I can advise the staff of writers there how to write. I'm joking, of course, I'm sure by then they'll know how. But for fun, here's a sentence like the one referenced above. You know, just for practice: "The Popsicle, wrapped in its wrap that graphically suggested the brand 'Popsicle' and enclosed the frozen treat, was symbolic of an ice cream product." I smell Pulitzer.

Yes, that's what this whole Web "article" is like. And for the record, it's actually because I, Gloucester de la Vegas, actually do care about America and 9/11 and humanity, and stuff. So I just would like a major news source like CNN not to make a mess of it. I'm in 1st grade now, and I know that I have moronic peers who write like monkeys with a crayon. But at least they're not paid by CNN to do it.

Hey, personal note to Sarah Palin: I'll bet you could read this CNN article and not find anything wrong with it. Nothing personal, it's just a gut feeling. You seem like a nice mommy, and I'm in a position to know, uniquely. But if you think I'm saying you're a bit dumb, shrill, self-serving, lack circumspection, and really don't have any normal human decency, yes, that's what I suspect about you. I'm sure you're very busy being on the campaign trail and you don't have time to consider what is or isn't good journalism. And the liberal media will always hate you because you're beautiful, or so you think.

But again, awesome mommy, I'm sure.

The above statements do not represent the editorial or moral position of "Diary of Fools".dot whatever. This is a legal disclaimer, of sorts. It may not be perfect, but it does the job. Get used to it, old people. This is the new way of doing things. You'll see when I'm 18, which will be the year 2020. There will be new "World Trade towers" by then, and they won't even be new any more, and hopefully the world will be at peace.