Monday, March 09, 2009

DoF Champions of Society: Debbie Schlussel

By Reno Gruber
Self-appointed parenting expert


Like most people this weekend, I treated(?) myself to the cinematic styling of Zak (sweet spelling, bro) Snyder's Watchmen. While I could go on about the greatness or not-so-greatness of the film (which fanboys and girls alike will seriously argue until we ourselves nuke each-other into oblivion,) the actual success of the graphic novel is not the champion we speak of. Neither is the amount of hype surrounding it. Good god the hypemachine was on 'forced-entry' for this one.

This installment is dedicated to a movie review. To be more accurate; dedicated to the writer of the most incindiary, specious movie review ever written. Well, at least a really fucking dumb one, anyhow.

(if you don't get hyperlinks, or are just generally new to computers, it can also be copied and pasted from here: http://www.debbieschlussel.com/archives/2009/03/the_watchmen_li.html)

Debbie Schlussel (and her ironically amusing website debbieschlussel.com) has taken a stand. Her stand is against this movie, and the first line of her movie review is a subtle hint towards this.

"If you take your kids out to see Watchmen, you're a moron. If you see this movie yourself, you're also probably a moron and a vapid, indecent human being."

(DoF loves to point out the irony that she probably saw this movie first to come to such a conclusion, and giggles how well that description probably fits herself.)

I actually agree with the first sentiment. If you do take your children to see this without any prior conversation on what they are about to see, you are kind of a fucking head trauma patient. Not to say that it will "ruin" anybody. For example, my brother is about as level-headed a motherfucker as I've ever met, and my parents accidentally took him to see Poltergeist when he was about 7. Apparently they didn't really know what it was about, and they just kinda showed up at the theater that day. Oops.

My brother was scared by what he saw, and they learned quickly that before they take any of us children to the movies, do just a bit of research. He wasn't ruined, scared yes. Enough to teach two young parents a little lesson. It was this crazy notion of parenting your children. (It's since been either outlawed or ignored in favor of a social rating system to help asleep-at-the wheel suburbanites take as little responsibility for their own offspring as possible, but it was a good thing for a while.)

While this movie will no doubt send millions out to read the book afterward, most people do not have prior knowledge of either this graphic novel, or creator Alan Moore's catalog of work. If you do a 4 minute search on the net, you will quickly realize this is a grown-up comic. A comic for the kids who grew up on comics now that they have grown up. It is a commentary on the whole notion of comic books. (I'll stop the interpretation there because it's second hand knowledge, ol Knarf Black or Merton Sussex could probably wax nerd about for hours if you asked [ps. don't.])

There are some things that are probably unwise to show a child. Why would you? They wouldn't get it. This movie is an intensely layered study on society both real and illusion. Kids rarely know anything besides their own immediate experience. The whole movie would be lost and it would just be blue dicks and sawed-off arms. So in that I agree with Mrs. Schlussel.

Her point, however, is that the Hollywood machine is directly marketing to small children with action toys. Well, sadly Mrs. Schlussel, those are for adults too. (sorry fellas, you know who.) It's called nostalgia. We all recreate our past in some way. Probably like when you try to shoe-horn yourself into an old dress. It reminds us of a simpler time. It's nothing to be ashamed of. These figures - as far as i'm aware - will be expensive and probably only available at most comic book and novelty shops. A quick internet search shows you that it's not Target or Wal-Mart selling them, but specialty shops for this segment of the population. If Target does sell them, it would be due to popular demand in time.

As I hate the drivel Hollywood dishes at us, its the conscious decision we make with our wallets that have this effect. It's like blaming the whore for making more money wearing trashy outfits instead of the Jaclyn Smith collection. It's her job to make money. If people are responding to the trashy outfit is that a comment on her, or the market of unsatisfied men who want to fuck a stranger for a small fee?

We're left with this society we've created; you can blame Hollywood, bad parenting, the death of the nuclear family, fear-tactics employed by the government, religion...but ultimately, it's on us. If a kid goes out and watches this movie, then commits an act, do we really think a movie hit a magical switch in his brain?

There is a confluence of events that lead up to the disassociation of society that people like Mrs. Schlussel blame Hollywood for. I hate her just for making me defend a shitty fucking industry like Hollywood.

Are we really so simple to think that one thing leads us to temptation, or that one act will deliver us from evil?

Yes, the movie is fucking violent. It is something that would take too much explanation to a child in my eyes, so one I was responsible for wouldn't see it. But I can promise you that if you're vapid and indecent, it's not because you watch this movie, or saw it as a child. I can even tell you that it's not even because you read Mrs. Schlussel's blog every day, although that would help in time. (Do yourself a favor and read the comments, especially where she goes after her own readers like a rabid pit bull without the ability to actually respond to their points. It's pretty amusing/maddening.)

People (like Debbie,) suck dick. People suck for many reasons. People however usually don't just decide to suck, they have a string of outcomes that leads to their suck-dickedness. Sometimes it's a justified outcome. Sometimes you just get a shitty break and your bleak outlook turns you into a dick. But remember, people suck dick. So there's always that.

11 comments:

Frank White said...

Yes Debbie, they made Nixon the president in 1985 purely because it is "cool" to not get history correct. That was it exactly.

You are clearly the most insightful film critic known to man, and your brand of "not even being on the same planet as the point" style criticism should be emulated by all your peers.

Anonymous said...

Reno:

Both you and Debbie are completely off the mark. This film is definitely made for young children. How better to show my daughters the inherent evils of lesbianism then taking her to see a film where they're killed in the opening moments? How better to show my son that women are there for the taking, and don't let them fight you off? How better to teach him that abortion is wrong, you just off the silly bitch who let herself get knocked up? This movie is completely steeped in exactly the black and white world view that I want my kids to grow up with. What, Merton, it's not? Only the psychologically questionable Rorschach refuses to compromise. Hmmm…maybe this wasn't aimed at 5 and 7 year-olds. But I don't need a nanny-stater like Debbie Schlussel telling me what I can and can't send my kids to see. It's all about the market place. We don't need movie ratings. Uh-oh, I'm ranting again. Must have been listening to too much talk radio again.

Reno Gruber said...

I almost deleted everything about agreeing with the point its not for children because its so fucking obvious, but for those who have no prior knowledge of the subject I had to at least give her that.

blaine_fridley said...

though, i'd probably let my kids watch this movie before i allowed them on debbieschlussel.com...

and knarf is totally right, being historically inaccurate is the coolest! almost cooler then when president woodrow wilson shot hitler into space or when general zod and his 2 kryptonian cronies busted out of the phantom zone, descended upon earth and assassinated archduke ferdinand, thereby sparking the conflict known as the korean war.

Lucy Parker said...

Um I'm almost 24 and Watchmen seriously disturbed me at points even though I was fully aware of what I was about to see. In any event, I can't walk into my blue living room now with out thinking of Dr. Manhattan's giant blue penis on the Imax screen.

Anonymous said...

I was caught in the vortex of hilarious comments on her website for about a half an hour this morning. Wow, this woman is off her rocker. Seriously.

And does she look like a porn star (albeit an old one) to anyone else?

Frank White said...

Well all the lip-liner does make her mouth kind of look like an anus, which makes sense from both the ideological and possible porn star viewpoints.

Tajmccall said...

Now now kids, its not nice to point out she looks like a turnpike lady of the night, and that she is somehow an uglier Ann Coulter.

Seriously, why do these women look the same?

Oh yah, batshit crazy must be a gene.

Anonymous said...

I think it's her lipstick and eye makeup that make her look like a porn star. And I can completely imagine her being condescending in the sack, as well.

Frank White said...

Follow Up: The guy at Decentfilms.com , my usual go-to dude for religiously malinformed film criticism, has been taking his job too seriously these days and wrote a halfway decent review. *Gasp* He has read the comic.

I guess as long as you aren't directly bashing Catholicism or promoting homosexuality you get a pass these days.

Unknown said...

I got sucked in to the comments section as well, it is like a car wreck, I couldn't look away.